Crystal Meth Santa Claus and his ex-Producer attack high-achieving woman

Left Wing Loons Letterman and his ex-Producer Barbara Gaines attach Bari Weiss

The Curious Case of CBS’s Sudden Standards

So let me get this straight: Barbara Gaines and David Letterman—those stalwart defenders of meritocracy and women in leadership—are now weeping into their old CBS coffee mugs because Bari Weiss, founder of The Free Press and former New York Times opinion editor, has taken the helm as Editor-in-Chief of CBS News.

Weiss, who built a multi-million dollar media company and earned her stripes at the Gray Lady, is somehow unqualified. Yet when she was safely ensconced in left-wing journalism, her credentials were impeccable. Funny how that works.

Here’s the delicious irony: Gaines herself is a Jewish, gay, married woman—precisely the demographic liberals claim to champion. Yet when another Jewish, gay, married woman achieves spectacular success outside the approved ideological boundaries, suddenly the sisterhood vanishes. Identity politics, it turns out, has fine print: terms and conditions apply only to those with correct opinions.

Letterman mourns the ghost of Edward R. Murrow while trashing a woman whose career has been dedicated to the kind of tough, independent journalism Murrow practiced—asking uncomfortable questions, challenging groupthink, refusing to genuflect before sacred cows.

But Weiss committed journalism’s unforgivable sin: she left the reservation. She questions prevailing orthodoxies. She thinks viewpoint diversity matters in newsrooms. She believes CBS News should cover stories all Americans care about, not just Manhattan-approved narratives.

When a woman succeeds by toeing the party line, she’s a hero. When she thinks independently, she’s an “idiot” destroying sacred institutions.

Weiss aims to restore CBS’s reputation for “fearless journalism.” Perhaps that’s what really terrifies them.

Weiss, who built a multi-million dollar media company and earned her stripes at the Gray Lady, a job which she nobly walked out of when her own colleagues started attacking her for not being woke enough. is somehow unqualified. Yet when she was safely ensconced in left-wing journalism, her credentials were impeccable. Funny how that works.

Letterman mourns the ghost of Edward R. Murrow while trashing a woman whose entire career has been dedicated to the kind of tough, independent journalism Murrow himself practiced—asking uncomfortable questions, challenging groupthink, refusing to genuflect before sacred cows.

But here’s the rub: Weiss committed journalism’s unforgivable sin. She left the reservation. She questions the prevailing orthodoxies. She thinks viewpoint diversity matters in newsrooms. She believes—radical notion—that CBS News should cover stories all Americans care about, not just those approved by the Manhattan intelligentsia.

The hypocrisy is rich enough to choke on. When a woman succeeds by toeing the party line, she’s a hero. When she dares to think independently, suddenly she’s an “idiot” destroying sacred institutions.

Weiss aims to restore CBS’s reputation for “fearless journalism.” Perhaps that’s what really terrifies them—a news operation that won’t automatically genuflect before their politics.

The People’s Forum: The Root of All Evil

“Within hours of Delta Force’s extraction of Venezuelan narco-dictator Nicolas Maduro, far-left activists flooded the streets with premade signs and polished talking points. The protests’ speedy appearance and apparent organization should have been no surprise. For years, groups like The People’s Forum (TPF) have cultivated a cultish following, capable of activating scores of organizations at a moment’s notice—always in service of the interests of America’s adversaries.

The People’s Forum is a “movement incubator” and “a home” for over 200 left-wing groups. Its Manhattan location offers “co-working space, conference rooms, a theater for film screenings, a media laboratory, a lending library, and [the] People’s Café,” as well as an art space, “ideal for art builds, poster making, screen printing.” Part of what makes the organization so quick to respond is that outsourcing isn’t necessary—everything is in-house.”

Read more at The CIty Journal.

Lawfare Project Triumphs Over Cooper Union

The Lawfare Project negotiated important reforms that Cooper Union will implement to keep Jews safe on campus:

  • School policy statement acknowledging Zionism as part of Jewish identity for many Jews.
  • ⁠No masks at protests.
  • ⁠Mandatory training on anti-Zionism
  • Pre-approval of posting
  • Use of IHRA Examples in evaluating antisemitism
  • Reporting requirements for Title VI coordinator

AND MUCH MORE…

West Midlands Police Lied to Prevent Maccabi Fans from Attending Soccer Game

via @JChimirie66677

“What happened last November in Birmingham was not a policing error. It was a moral failure – followed by a bureaucratic cover-up. West Midlands Police knew Jewish football fans were facing a credible threat of Islamist violence. They had the intelligence months in advance. They warned internally that Jews would be targeted. And when the moment came, instead of enforcing the law against those planning violence, they banned Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters from entering Villa Park. Jews were excluded “for their own safety” – the oldest lie in the book. The phrase every coward reaches for when he wants to dress discrimination up as compassion. When asked to justify the decision, senior officers did not defend it honestly. They rewrote it. Craig Guildford stood before Parliament and insisted the ban rested on sound intelligence. It did not. The force leaned on dubious claims about previous matches in Amsterdam – claims later disputed by Dutch police – and even admitted that one key assertion was backed by a single Google search. That is not intelligence. It is fabrication dressed up as due diligence. Mike O’Hara went further. He told MPs that Maccabi fans themselves posed a risk to “the local community”. Read that again. Jews facing organised threats of violence were reframed as the danger. Meanwhile, the assessed risk to Jewish fans was quietly downgraded, while the risk to “the community” was upgraded – after the decision to exclude them was already taking shape. The Home Affairs Select Committee saw through it. Dame Karen Bradley accused the force of “scraping for justification”. She was being polite. What the committee uncovered was a decision made first, then laundered through paperwork to make it look inevitable. And why was it deemed inevitable? Because the police chose not to confront Islamist threats on British streets. They knew local extremists were talking openly about violence. They knew some had armed themselves. They knew Jews would be hunted. Their response was not arrests, dispersal orders, surveillance, or force. It was surrender relabelled as safety. Kemi Badenoch was right to call this capitulation. When police treat threats as vetoes, they stop being a force of law and become managers of sectarian pressure. They cease to serve the public and start negotiating with mobs. The implications go far beyond football. If a hostile crowd can threaten violence and force the removal of Jews from public life, then citizenship is no longer equal. It becomes conditional – granted only to those whose presence does not anger the loudest faction in the street. The Board of Deputies of British Jews understands this perfectly. Their demand for the Chief Constable to step aside is not about vengeance. It’s about trust. Policing depends on confidence, and confidence cannot survive when the police blame the threatened instead of the threat. The defenders of this decision keep repeating the same word: “community”. But they never mean the whole community. They mean the most aggressive, the most volatile, the most willing to intimidate. That is not community safety. It is community veto. We have seen this pattern before. In Rotherham, where police chose “community cohesion” over protecting girls; in Cologne, where mass assaults were downplayed to preserve calm; and again after 7 October, when Jewish communities across the West were told to hide themselves while authorities managed the threat instead of confronting it. A threat emerges. The state decides enforcement is too risky. Responsibility is shifted. Language is softened. Files are adjusted. Parliament is misled. And the victims are told this is all being done for their own good. This is how surrender is repackaged as governance. Birmingham shows where Britain now stands. Not neutral. Not confused. But bending – and then lying about the bend.”

Saudis Set Sites on Florida and Hollywood

This “soft money” influence is overwhelming America’s culture and independence, dwarfs AIPAC spending by billions, yet somehow eludes the concerns of “America Firster” neo-Nazis like Carlson and MTG.

https://twitter.com/AmyMek/status/1990192101175525464?s=20

“How Steve Bannon conned the working class”

This opinion piece by John Mac Ghlionn argues that Steve Bannon has “conned the working class” by posing as a populist hero while being a wealthy elite. He claims Bannon’s “blue-collar prophet” persona is a “shameless act,” pointing to his background as a banker, his Hollywood producer career, and the fact that he earns royalties from the show, “Seinfeld”. The article cites the “Build the Wall” for which Bannon was arrested on a yacht, as proof of his deceit. Mac Ghlionn concludes that Bannon is not a revolutionary but a “salesman in battle gear” who studies, scripts, and monetizes the anger of the very people he pretends to champion.

The Most Important Article You Will Read this Year

“What I Saw And Heard In Washington”

Groyperism’s Spread Among Generation Z Conservative Apparatchiks Is Real

In this blog post, Rod Dreher details his recent trip to Washington, where he met with VP J.D. Vance and Hungarian PM Viktor Orban, but his main focus is on the alarming spread of “Groyperism” and overt antisemitism among young Generation Z conservatives. Dreher reports from his conversations that this radicalism is not a fringe movement but a significant trend fueled by the generation’s economic despair, nihilistic rage against all institutions, and a feeling of being culturally dispossessed and lied to. He warns that these young conservatives are increasingly drawn to tearing down the system rather than reforming it, show a frightening openness to authoritarianism, and that this deep-seated antisemitism poses a “spiritually poisonous” and politically destructive threat to the future of conservatism.

Saavedra: MTG Sets Herself Up as the Victim

McCormick: The Grifter’s Guide to Controversy